SPC, SPP jointly release typical cases of objections to enforcing judgments and rulings
The Supreme People's Court (SPC) and the Supreme People's Procuratorate (SPP) jointly released legal interpretations involving objections to enforcing court judgments and rulings.
In order to guide the accurate understanding and application of the legal interpretation, the two top legal authorities jointly collected and selected several typical cases in this regard.
The cases involve acts of avoiding judgment enforcement through false settlements, fabricating long-term rental agreements, transferring assets through divorce agreements, and transferring property guaranteed to courts. Cases where prosecutors determine no crime exists and decide not to prosecute are also included, offering educational value. The release of these cases is expected to enhance deterrence and foster a culture of integrity and law observance across society.
Integrity is a fundamental value in Chinese culture and an essential component of socialist core values, serving as a foundation for the development of a well-ordered society. Serious acts of dishonesty can lead to criminal liability. Among these, criminal activities involving objections to enforcing court judgments and rulings directly challenge the compulsory enforcement of effective judgments by courts, seriously undermine judicial and social credibility, and severely infringe on the legitimate rights and interests of those who win the lawsuits. They should be harshly punished in accordance with the law.